In a dispute involving misclassifications within customs entry documents, Court of International Trade judgment is affirmed in part and vacated in part where: 1) the court properly held that defendant misclassified certain merchandise under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States; and 2) the court erred in upholding the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection’s determination that UPS did not exercise responsible supervision and control in violation of 19 U.S.C. sec. 1641, as Customs did not consider all of the factors in the statute defining responsible supervision and control.
Read U.S. v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc., No. 08-1409
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States Court of International Trade. Submitted: March 11, 2009Filed: August 11, 2009
JudgesBefore SCHALL, ARCHER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.Opinion by ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
CounselFor Plaintiff: Patricia M. McCarthy, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
For Defendant: Terence J. Lynam, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
