Defendant’s mail fraud conviction is affirmed, where: 1) there was no reasonable probability that the verdict would have been different had Defendant received certain undisclosed evidence; and 2) any variance between the indictment and the evidence presented at trial did not substantially prejudice his defense.
Read US v. Emor, No. 07-3092
Appellate Information
Argued December 8, 2008
Decided July 17, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Griffith
Counsel
For Appellant:
Peter V. Taylor, Washington, DC
For Appellee:
Michael T. Ambrosino, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
