California cannot impose its own restrictions on how Golden State slaughterhouses must address non-ambulatory animals.

In a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Elena Kagan, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today in National Meat Association v. Harris, and ruled that the Federal Meat Inspection Act (FMIA) preempts a California statute that prohibits slaughterhouses from buying, selling, or receiving non-ambulatory animals.

Following the release of a 2008 Humane Society undercover video that exposed inhumane animal treatment in California slaughterhouses, the state legislature strengthened state laws regarding the treatment of non-ambulatory animals. A new law provided a $20,000 fine for buying, selling, receiving, holding, processing, or butchering non-ambulatory animals for human consumption.

The National Meat Association (NMA) sued to enjoin enforcement of the law based on federal preemption. The Supreme Court sided with NMA, finding that the FMIA expressly preempts such a state law. That means that California slaughterhouses can return to more-relaxed standards regarding non-ambulatory animals.

SCOTUSblog joked that Justice Kagan and her staff had become vegetarians after writing the opinion. Kidding aside, do you think this decision will negatively impact California’s meat industry?

Related Resources:

  • National Meat Association v. Harris (Supreme Court)
  • Nothing Like California Medical Marijuana Law to Brighten the Day (FindLaw’s California Case Law blog)
  • Asbestos Ruling Favors Defendants in Products Liability Cases (FindLaw’s California Case Law blog)
  • Federal Appeals Court Rejects Federal Preemption Claim Against California “Downed Animal” Law (FindLaw)

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules