What do you get when you put “law school”, “party”, and “SCOTUS” together? 

But in a landmark Supreme Court decision this week, in which UC Hastings Law School was a party, SCOTUS ruled 5-4 in favor of the public law school’s decision not to grant recognition to a Christian student organization.

Ginsberg pens the decision, Alito the dissent.

Those in favor.

 

 

Those in dissent.

 Related Resources:

  • Freedom of All Student Groups at Stake in CLS case at Supreme
  • Court (FindLaw Writ)Can a
  • Public Law School Constitutionally Require a Christian Student Group Not to
  • Exclude Non-Christians and Gay Persons? The Supreme Court Will
  • Decide (FindLaw Writ)More on
  • the Supreme Court’s CLS v. Martinez Case, Which Asks Whether a Public Law School
  • Can Deny Funding and Recognition to a Student Christian Organization that
  • Excludes Gay Students: A Response to Mr. Baylor (FindLaw Writ)UC Hastings Law School Student Group Heads to Supreme Court
  • (FindLaw’s Greedy Associates) “Most Insignificant Supreme Court Justice?” Believe It or Not,
  • There is a Debate. (FindLaw’s Greedy Associates) Law
  • School Admissions Minority Report (FindLaw’s Greedy Associates)

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules