In an employment termination action, trial court judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) there was substantial evidence that defendant violated public policy in dismissing plaintiff; and 2) there was insufficient evidence of malice, fraud or oppression to support the award of punitive damages.
Read Scott v. Phoenix Schools, Inc., No. C058539 in PDF
Read Scott v. Phoenix Schools, Inc., No. C058539 in HTML
Appellate InformationAPPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Placer County, James D. Garbolino, Judge. Reversed in part and affirmed in part.THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICTFiled: June 30, 2009
JudgesBefore BLEASE, Acting P.J., SIMS ,J., NICHOLSON, J. Opinion by BLEASE, Acting P.J.
CounselFor Plaintiff: Mary-Alice Coleman and James C. Ashworth.For Defendant: Kronick, Moskovitz, Tiedemann & Girard, Bruce A. Scheidt, Kristianne T. Seargeant and Meredith Packer.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
