In a putative class action against Citigroup by its former employees challenging the company’s forfeiture provision of a voluntary employee incentive compensation plan (Plan) upon termination in violation of Labor Code section 201 and 202, judgment of the court of appeals granting Citigroup’s motion for summary judgment is affirmed as the company Plan’s forfeiture provision does not run afoul of sections 201 or 202 because no earned wages remain unpaid upon termination for cause or resignation.
Read Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc. , No. S161385 [PDF]
Read Schachter v. Citigroup, Inc. , No. S161385 [HTML]
Appellate InformationAppeal from Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC191447
Filed November 2, 2009
JudgesBefore: George, C. J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., McConnell, J., Moreno, J., and Ramirez, J.
Opinion by Moreno, J.
CounselFor Appellant: Law Offices of Ashley D. Posner, Ashley D. Posner and Barbara Brudno
For Appellee: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Raoul D. Kennedy, Joren S. Bass, Joan Shreffler, Douglas B. Adler, Seth M. Schwartz, Jeffrey W. McKenna, William P. Frank, Preeta D. Bansal and Sarah E. McCallum
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
