Defendant’s conviction for willfully failing to update his registration as a sex offender is affirmed in part where the registration statute did not require the prosecution to prove that the defendant had established a new address; but reversed in part where there was no evidence presented to the jury regarding defendant’s whereabouts after he left his last registered address.
Read People v. Wallace, No. A120500
Appellate Information
Filed August 18, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Jenkins
Counsel
For Appellant:
Richard Such, Palo Alto, CA
For Respondent:
Brent W. Wilner, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
