Conviction of defendant for making criminal threats is affirmed as the trial court was acting within its discretion in denying defendant’s Pitchess motion to the extent that it made a common sense determination that defendant’s version of events was not plausible based on a reasonable and realistic assessment of the facts and allegations.
Read People v. Sanderson, No. E047284 [HTML]
Read People v. Sanderson, No. E047284 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed February 9, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Miller
CounselFor Appellant: Christopher Nalls
For Appellee: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, James D. Dutton, Charles C. Ragland and Scott C. Taylor, Deputy Attorneys General
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
