In an eminent domain proceeding, judgment against Caltrans on defendants’ goodwill claim and an order awarding litigation expenses to defendants are affirmed as the claim for goodwill damages is not preempted by the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, and the award of litigation expense is supported by substantial evidence. 

Read People ex rel. Dep’t of Transp. v. Acosta, No. C059064 [PDF]

Read People ex rel. Dep’t of Transp. v. Acosta, No. C059064 [HTML]

Filed October 26, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Hull

Counsel

For Appellant:  Ronald W. Beals, Thomas C. Fellenz, Joann Georgallis, and Harjinder K. Chima

For Appellee:  Greenan, Peffer, Sallander & Lally, Kevin D. Lally, John P. Makin, and Alice M. Peiler; Heiser Law Corporation and Jeffrey D. Heiser

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules