In a petition for a writ of mandamus to overturn trial court’s order compelling petitioners to arbitrate their claims against respondents, the petition is granted where the paragraphs in the account agreements at issue requiring arbitration before a panel of three arbitrators and prohibiting consolidation or joinder of claims were unconscionable and therefore unenforceable.
Read Parada v. Superior Court, No. G041339
Appellate Information
Filed August 26, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Fybel
Counsel
For Petitioners:
Steve Buchwalter, Law Offices of Steve A. Buchwalter, Encino, CA
For Real Parties in Interest:
Thomas A. Pistone, Pistone & Wolder, Irvine, CA
Neil A. Goteiner, Farella Brain & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
