In plaintiff’s request for a writ of mandate to seek civil damages against a university for retaliation, trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s request is reversed as, the university did not satisfactorily address plaintiff’s complaint because it applied an incorrect standard in evaluating whether his retaliation claims were made in good faith, and also failed to address the matter of discipline and punishment despite having found retaliation.
Read Ohton v. California State Univ. of San Diego, No. D053738 [HTML]
Read Ohton v. California State Univ. of San Diego, No. D053738 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed January 12, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge O’Rourke
CounselFor Appellant: Schoville & Arnell, Dennis A. Schoville, Louis G. Arnell, James S. Iagmin; Boudreau Williams and Jon R. Williams
For Appellee: Gordon & Rees, Christopher B. Cato, Eric M. Volkert and James J. McMullen, Jr.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
