In plaintiff’s suit on behalf of her deceased husband against his former employer claiming that his brain tumor was caused by exposure to toxic chemicals while working for Technicolor, plaintiff’s petition challenging an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to a claim that plaintiff was injured by exposure to toxic chemicals and vapors on her husband’s clothing and person that he brought home is denied where Technicolor does not owe plaintiff a duty of due care, as plaintiff’s attempts to state a cause of action fall short of the Rowland criteria.
Read Oddone v. Sup. Ct., No. B213784 [HTML]
Read Oddone v. Sup. Ct., No. B213784 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed November 24, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Flier
CounselFor Appellant: Gonzalez & Robinson, Joseph D. Gonzalez and Keith A. Robinson
For Appellee: Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp, Hayward J. Kaiser and Paul Guelpa
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
