In plaintiff’s suit against the defendants alleging he was defrauded into investing in their company, defendants’ petition for writ of mandate is denied as trial court properly found plaintiff’s peremptory challenge to the judge to be timely where: 1) the second lawsuit involves a different defendant and different causes of action asserted against that defendant; and 2) the second lawsuit does not arise from conduct in, or involve enforcement or modification of an order in, the first lawsuit.
Read Nutragenetics, LLC v. Sup. Ct., No. B217853 [HTML]
Read Nutragenetics, LLC v. Sup. Ct., No. B217853 [PDF]
Filed November 17, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Mohr
CounselFor Appellant: Stearns Kim & Stearns, Lawrence B. Bemis, Ryan E. Stearns and Lauren B. Browne
For Appellee: Gallo & Associates, Ray E. Gallo and Sharon S. Laveson
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
