Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of plaintiff’s Fifth Amendment taking claim is affirmed where it correctly determined that plaintiff’s property interest arose from access to and use of a navigable waterway, and thus, the interest is subservient to the Government’s navigational servitude and is not compensable under the Fifth Amendment.
Read Northwest Louisiana Fish & Game Preserve Comm’n v. U.S., No. 08-5039
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims.Decided: July 31, 2009
JudgesBefore LOURIE, RADER, and DYK, Circuit Judges.Opinion by RADER, circuit Judge.
CounselFor Plaintiff: William P. Crews, Jr., William P. Crews, Jr., LLC, Natchitoches, Louisiana.
For Defendant: Mark R. Haag, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules