Vill. Northridge Homeowners Ass’n v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., S161008, involved a homeowners association’s suit against an insurance company, claiming that the insurer fraudulently induced it to settle a Northridge earthquake-related claim for less than it was worth under the policy. In reversing the judgment of the court of appeals, the court remanded the matter in holding that a release of a disputed claim does not permit a party to elect the remedy of a suit for damages when the release itself bars that option. Instead, the insured party to the release must follow the rules governing rescission of the release before suing the insurer for damages.
In re Jimenez, S167100, concerned a challenge to a defendant’s cursory one-claim habeas petition, requesting for a deferment of a decision on the petition until his habeas counsel had an adequate opportunity to investigate various factual and legal matters that might lead to additional claims regarding defendant’s 1998 capital murder conviction (to be presented in an amended petition). In granting the petition, the court held that a departure from the requirement that generally a habeas corpus petitioner must raise all claims in a single unamended petition is appropriate under the extraordinary circumstances of this case where defendant invoked his statutory right to the court’s appointment of habeas corpus counsel to challenge his conviction and death sentence, and had to wait eight and one-half years for counsel’s appointment.
Related Resources:
- Full text of In re Jimenez, S167100
- Full text of Vill. Northridge Homeowners Ass’n v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., S161008
- Full text of In re Morgan, S162413
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
