In an equitable contribution action between two insurers, trial court’s judgment is affirmed where: 1) substantial evidence supports the trial court’s findings regarding the project completion date; 2) the court did not err in ruling that the contractors warranty endorsements in defendant’s policies were enforceable preconditions for coverage; and 3) coverage was not available under defendant’s umbrella policy. Furthermore, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s allocation of relative responsibility to the carriers, and the court properly exercised its discretion in setting the amounts of equitable contribution
Read N. Am. Capacity Ins. Co. v. Claremont Liab. Ins. Co., No. B207878
Appellate Information
Filed September 2, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Flier
Counsel
For Appellant: Grimm, Vranjes, McCormick & Graham, A. Carl Yaeckel and Charles A. Phllilps
For Respondent: Selman Breitman, Sheryl Q. Leichenger, Eldon S. Edson and Tam T. Glunt.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
