In an action to enjoin further implementation of a police checkpoint program in Defendant city, the denial of a preliminary injunction is reversed, where the checkpoint did not meet the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of individualized suspicion.
Read Mills v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 08-7127
Appellate Information
Argued May 8, 2009
Decided July 10, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Sentelle
Counsel
For Appellants
Mara E. Verheyden-Hilliard, Washington, DC
For Appellee:
Todd S. Kim, Solicitor General, Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
