In a sex and age discrimination action, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where: 1) defendant failed to carry its burden to show that plaintiff did not timely contact an EEO counselor and thus did not exhaust his administrative remedies; and 2) plaintiff did not fail to respond to defendant’s exhaustion argument.
Read Miller v. Hersman, No. 08-5494
Appellate Information
Argued November 17, 2009
Decided February 5, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Henderson
Counsel
For Appellant:
David A. Young and Carl S. Nadler, Arnold & Porter LLP, Washington, DC
For Appellee:
Brian P. Hudak and R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant United States Attorneys, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
