Trial court order denying plaintiff’s petition for writ of mandate is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff’s exclusion from the Medi-Cal program amounted to disbarment and he therefore has a liberty interest at stake; 2) plaintiff has not identified any aspect of the administrative appeal procedure in connection with his temporary suspension and denial of reenrollment which fell short of the demands of due process; and 3) there is no support for plaintiff’s allegation that the trial court lacked the complete administrative record.
Read Mednik v. State Dept. of Health Care Serv., No. B193269 in PDF
Read Mednik v. State Dept. of Health Care Serv., No. B193269 in HTML
Appellate InformationAPPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Dzintra Janavs, Judge. Affirmed.SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOURFiled: June 30, 2009
JudgesBefore EPSTEIN, P.J., WILLHITE, J., SUZUKAWA, J.Opinion by EPSTEIN, P.J.
CounselFor Plaintiff: Landau & Landau, Bruce G. Landau; Law Office of Laura Seraso and Laura Seraso.For Defendant: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Douglas M. Press, Assistant Attorney General, Richard T. Waldow, Erin S. Kubota and Gala E. Dunn, Deputy Attorneys General.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
