In plaintiff’s suit against defendant-general contractor on a public works project, and its surety and bonding companies for monies owed at the end of the project, trial court’s award of $150,000 in attorney fees to the defendants is affirmed as the trial court correctly concluded that defendant had not violated the applicable prompt payment statutes.
Read Martin Bros. Constr., Inc. v. Thompson Pacific Constr., Inc., No. C058944 [HTML]
Read Martin Bros. Constr., Inc. v. Thompson Pacific Constr., Inc., No. C058944 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed December 4, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Cantil-Sakauye
CounselFor Appellant: Law Office of Anthony T. Caso, Anthony T. Caso; Nageley Meredith & Miller, Inc., Gregory Alan Meredith
For Appellee: Solan & Park, Kevin M. Solan, William L. Jacobson
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
