In plaintiff’s suit against his former employer for retaliatory termination, judgment pursuant to a jury’s verdict in favor of defendant and denial of plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is affirmed where: 1) the trial court did not err in excluding evidence of plaintiff’s alleged disability as he failed to make known to the court the purpose and relevance of the evidence to any other issue; and 2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that a proposed settlement agreement fell within Evidence Code section 1152’s broad scope.
Read Mangano v. Verity, Inc., No. H033286 [HTML]
Read Mangano v. Verity, Inc., No. H033286 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed November 16, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Mihara
CounselFor Appellant: Stephen R. Jaffe
For Appellee: Gregory L. Doll, Hunter R. Eley, Doll Amir & Eley LLP
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
