Trial court order order dismissing defendant’s claim for loss of goodwill connected to the acquisition by eminent domain of real property is reversed where the court erred in concluding that defendant was not entitled to compensation for goodwill because it was a month-to-month tenant as nothing requires that a business owner’s entitlement to goodwill must be based on a written lease on the property that is taken.
Read Los Angeles Unified School District v. Pulgarin, No. B206892 in PDF
Read Los Angeles Unified School District v. Pulgarin, No. B206892 in HTML
Appellate InformationAPPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Joanne O’Donnell, Judge. Reversed.SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOURFiled: June 23, 2009
JudgesBefore EPSTEIN, P.J., MANELLA, J., SUZUKAWA, J.Opinion by EPSTEIN, P.J.
CounselFor Plaintiff: Oliver, Sandifer & Murphy, Connie Cooke Sandifer and Cynthia C. Miller.
For Defendant: Century Law Group, Karen A. Larson and Daniel A. Woodford.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
