In a personal injury action based on plaintiff’s fall from a horse, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where, although it became evident the injured rider lacked the skills to control a horse in that setting, the owners of the horse were entitled to accept plaintiff’s representation that she had experience riding horses, thus indicating she knew how to control horses.
Read Levinson v. Owens, No. C057565
Appellate Information
Filed August 26, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Scotland
Counsel
For Appellants:
Nancy Hersh, Hersh & Hersh, San Francisco, CA
Daniel U. Smith, Law Office of Daniel U. Smith, San Francisco, CA
For Respondents:
Mark G. Bonino, Ellingson McLay & Scott, Redwood City, CA
Wayne H. Maire, Maire & Beasley, Redding, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
