Trial court’s ruling that the document establishing that defendant was driving with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or higher was inadmissible hearsay is reversed as the court abused its discretion in determining that the forensic report was inadmissible hearsay.     

Read Lee v. Valverde, No. E046731 [PDF]

Read Lee v. Valverde, No. E046731 [HTML]

Filed October 29, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Miller

Counsel

For Appellant:  Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Alicia M. B. Fowler, Assistant Attorney General, Celine M. Cooper and Michael Yi, Deputy Attorneys General

For Appellee:  Milligan, Beswick, Levine & Knox and C. Patrick Milligan

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules