In plaintiffs’ suit involving the question of the proper line between the parties’ areas of littoral rights for use of the water adjacent to their upland property, summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs is affirmed where: 1) defendants’ motions to amend and supplement the pleadings were properly denied; 2) defendants were barred from raising unpleaded defenses or causes of action in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment; and 3) trial court properly determined the littoral rights of the parties in its order granting plaintiffs’ summary judgment motion.
Read Kendall v. Walker, No. A105981 [HTML]
Read Kendall v. Walker, No. A105981 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed January 26, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Kline
Counsel
For Appellant: Miller Starr & Regalia, Scott A. Sommer, Lewis J. Soffer
For Appellee: Law Office of David R. Fischer, David Randall Fischer
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
