In plaintiff’s consumer protection and fraud suit against defendant-insurance company concerning the sale of a so-called “vanishing premium” life insurance policy, denial of plaintiff’s motion for certification of the action as a class action is affirmed as the court did not err in concluding that he had not demonstrated any of the requisites for class certification. 

Read Kaldenbach v. Mut. of Omaha Life Ins. Co., No. G038539 [PDF]

Read Kaldenbach v. Mut. of Omaha Life Ins. Co., No. G038539 [HTML]

Filed October 26, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge O’Leary

Counsel

For Appellant:  Coughlin & Conforti, Frank J. Coughlin and Beverly A. Blais

For Appellee:  Barger & Wolen, Sandra I. Weishart and Misty A. Murray

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules