In plaintiffs’ suit against defendant for damages arising out of their sexual molestation by defendant’s husband, trial court’s judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part where: 1) trial court properly sustained the demurrer with regard to plaintiffs’ second and fifth causes of action for negligence; but 2) trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer to plaintiffs’ third and sixth causes of action for intentional misconduct.
Read Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270 [HTML]
Read Joseph v. Johnson, No. A123270 [PDF]
Filed November 6, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Pollak
Counsel
For Appellant: Arnold I. Berschler
For Appellee: Buresh, Kaplan, Jang & Feller, Lawrence A. Baker
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
