Trial court’s order declaring plaintiff a putative spouse on the ground that the parties’ marriage was invalid because the husband already had a wife when he married plaintiff is affirmed as, applying the unambiguous language of Family Code section 2251, the parties’ union is a putative marriage and the property acquired during that union is quasi-marital property subject to division as community property.
Read In re Marriage of Tejeda, No. H033001 [HTML]
Read In re Marriage of Tejeda, No. H033001 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed November 25, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge McAdams
CounselFor Appellant: Baskin & Grant, LLP, Caleb S. Baskin, Heidi Simonson
For Appellee: Dolly Ares
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
