In re C.B., E050209, concerned a challenge to the juvenile court’s order authorizing a father to leave California with his children to Alabama, in dependency proceedings.  In affirming the judgment, the court held that it need not be decided whether the juvenile court erred in setting aside an allegation against the father, as California cases have consistently held that the Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC) does not apply to an out-of-state placement with a parent, and as such, the (ICPC) simply did not apply in this case, regardless of whether the father was an offending or a non-offending parent.

Related Resource:

  • Full text of In re C.B., E050209

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules