In dependency proceedings, an appeal from an order detaining appellant’s daughter is dismissed as moot, although the court of appeals nevertheless reviews the issues on the merits and determines that the trial court erred to the extent it used a non-final opinion of an appellate court to alter its procedures and influence the outcome of the matter before it, as the trial court should have proceeded solely on the basis of its continuing jurisdiction, which authorizes it to continue to decide issues concerning the child’s placement and well-being during the pendency of an appeal.
Read In re Anna S., No. D055036 [HTML]
Read In re Anna S., No. D055036 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed January 13, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Benke
CounselFor Appellant: Lelah Selene Forrey-Baker
For Appellee: John J. Sansone, County Counsel, John E. Philips, Chief Deputy County Counsel, Gary C. Seiser, Deputy County Counsel
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
