Court of International Trade affirming the Dept. of Commerce’s valuation of plaintiff’s imports is affirmed where Commerce’s decision to use a constructed market price in valuing plaintiff’s imports was supported by substantial evidence and not contrary to law, as Commerce has shown that its new methodology of constructing a market price was permissible under the statute and that it had good reasons for the new methodology.
Read Huvis Corp. v. US, No. 09-1021
Appellate InformationAppeal from the United States Court of International Trade.Decided: June 25, 2009
JudgesBefore LOURIE, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.Opinion by LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
CounselFor Plaintiff: Michael P. House, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Washington.For Defendant: Stephen C. Tosini, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
