In a personal injury action, denial of an insurer’s motion to intervene is affirmed where the insurer, having denied coverage and having refused to defend the action on behalf of its insured, did not have a direct and immediate interest to warrant intervention in the litigation.
Read Hinton v. Beck, No. C056911
Appellate Information
Filed August 25, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Blease
Counsel
For Appellants:
Lois A. Lindstrom, Ericksen, Arbuthnot, Kilduff, Day & Lindstrom, Walnut Creek, CA
Gregory A. Mase, Ericksen, Arbuthnot, Kilduff, Day & Lindstrom, Walnut Creek, CA
For Respondent:
John D. Barr, Barr & Mudford, Redding, CA
J. Michael Favor, Barr & Mudford, Redding, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
