In an environmental dispute involving the development of residential properties, trial court judgment is affirmed where: 1) the court did not err in refusing to grant plaintiff’s writ petition seeking to force defendant to set aside a resolution determining that plaintiff was not a qualified conservation entity and enter a new resolution; 2) the court properly granted summary judgment on plaintiff’s causes of action for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing against certain defendants; and 3) the court properly awarded those defendants attorney’s fees and costs as plaintiffs failed to demonstrate they were entitled to reversal of the judgment.
Read Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, No. E042229 in PDF
Read Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cucamonga, No. E042229 in HTML
Appellate InformationAPPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Thomas A. Peterson, Barry L. Plotkin, and Ben T. Kayashima, Judges. Affirmed.FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWOFiled July 21, 2009
JudgesBefore MILLER, J., RAMIREZ, P.J., McKINSTER, J. Opinion by MILLER, J.
CounselFor Plaintiff: The Law Office of Craig A. Sherman and Craig A. Sherman. For Defendant: Richards, Watson & Gershon, Mitchell E. Abbott and Ginetta L. Giovinco.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
