Peremptory writ vacating the trial court’s order granting defendant Vargas’ motion to transfer the action to Orange County Superior Court is granted where plaintiff’s action arises from a consumer transaction specified in the statutory venue exception of Code of Civil Procedure sec. 395 (b) and thus venue is proper in the court of the county of his residence.
Read Fontaine v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County, No. H033811 in PDF
Read Fontaine v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County, No. H033811 in HTML
Appellate InformationAPPEAL from Santa Clara County Superior Court Superior Court. SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICTFiled June 10, 2009PUBLISHED July 7, 2009
JudgesBefore: BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, ACTING P.J., MIHARA, J., MCADAMS, J.Opinion by BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, ACTING P.J.
CounselFor Petitioner: Frederick William Schwinn, Raeon R. Roulston, Consumer Law Center, Inc.
For Real Parties in Interest: Michael Raymond Williams, Finlayson, Augustini & Williams, LLP.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
