In an action by an insurer seeking a declaration that plaintiff had no duty under its title insurance policies to defend or indemnify defendant, judgment for plaintiff is affirmed where defendant was not an insured under the policy because it was not a successor in ownership of the mortgage at issue.
Read First Am. Title Ins. Co. v. XWarehouse Lending Corp., No. A119931
Appellate Information
Filed August 28, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Siggins
Counsel
For Appellant:
Barry D. Hovis, Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP, San Francisco, CA
Walter J.R. Traver, Musick, Peeler & Garrett LLP, San Francisco, CA
For Respondent:
Michael T. Fogarty, McDonough Holland & Allen, Sacramento, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
