In a petition for review of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) partial denial of a credit against charges for future transmission service to Petitioner utilities, the petition is dismissed where Petitioners lacked standing because FERC’s remedy did not actually require the utilities to issue transmission credits.
Read Exxon Mobil Corp. v. FERC, No. 07-1306
Appellate Information
Argued November 14, 2008
Decided July 7, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Griffith
Counsel
For Petitioners:
Ashley C. Parrish, Duncan, Weinberg, Genzer & Pembroke P.C., Washington, DC
William R. Mapes Jr., Duncan, Weinberg, Genzer & Pembroke P.C., Washington, DC
For Respondent:
Samuel I. Soopper, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
Cynthia A. Marlette, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
