In a patent infringement case involving intraluminal grafts for treating aneurysms and occlusive diseases, district court’s grant of summary judgment of noninfringement is affirmed as the court correctly held that no reasonable jury could find literal infringement and that no reasonable jury could find infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
Read Edwards LifeSci. LLC v. Cook Inc., No. 09-1006
Appeal from: United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Decided September 22, 2009
Judges
Before Lourie, Rader, and Moore, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Lourie, Circuit Judge.
Counsel
For Appellant: Hugh A. Abrams, Sidney Austin LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, and Constantine L. Trela, Jr., David T. Pritikin, Lisa A. Schneider
For Appellee: Richard A. Kaplan, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione, of Chicago, Illinois, and Bradley G. Lane, Jeffry M. Nichols, Julie L. Leichtman
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
