In fifteen plaintiffs’ statewide clergy sex abuse case against defendants, trial court’s order sustaining defendants’ demurrers without leave to amend is affirmed as childhood sexual molestation victims whose claims were time barred before January 1, 2003, had to sue during the ensuing one-year revival period regardless of whether they had yet discovered the link between the earlier abuse and their adult outset of psychological injuries from that abuse.
Read Doe v. Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, No. B209557 [HTML]
Read Doe v. Roman Catholic Bishop of San Diego, No. B209557 [PDF]
Filed November 6, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Rubin
Counsel
For Appellant: Zalkin & Zimmer, Irwin M. Zalkin and Devin M. Storey
For Appellee: Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman and Lee W. Potts; Shea Stokes Roberts & Wagner, Maria C. Roberts, Shirley Gauvin, and Christina Yates
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
