In an appeal from the trial court’s order quashing service of summons and process on the Archdiocese of Cashel & Emly in Ireland regarding alleged sexual molestation by clergy, the order is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff waived the issue by his failure to fairly and completely set forth, discuss, and analyze the relevant facts under the applicable substantial evidence standard of review; and 2) substantial evidence supported the trial court’s ruling that defendant had insufficient contacts with the State of California to support an exercise of either general or specific jurisdiction.
Read Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & Emly, No. B206272
Appellate Information
Filed August 31, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Rubin
Counsel
For Appellant:
John C. Manly and Vince W. Finaldi, Manly & Stewart
For Respondent:
Nicholas W. Heldt, Cynthia H. Plevin and Ryan L. Harrison, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
