An order by the trial court vacating a default judgment entered against a defendant is affirmed as plaintiff’s contention confuses the court’s power to reconsider the merits of the entered judgment itself, or to reconsider interim orders which have been subsumed within that judgment, with its power to reconsider an order which it is specifically authorized to make in the first instance after entry of the judgment under Code of Civil Proc. section 473(b).
Read D.R.S. Trading Co., Inc. v. Barnes, No. G041551 [HTML]
Read D.R.S. Trading Co., Inc. v. Barnes, No. G041551 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed December 23, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Bedsworth
CounselFor Appellant: Pestotnik & Gold and Russell A. Gold; Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps and Charles A. Bird
For Appellee: Law Offices of Thomas E. Francis and Thomas E. Francis; Bohm, Matsen, Kegel & Aguilera and Raymond E. Brown
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
