In an action alleging that plaintiff’s supervisor at the Federal Aviation Administration discriminated against her on the basis of sex by reassigning her to an inferior position, judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the magistrate judge correctly instructed the jury on the relevant legal theory; and 2) plaintiff did not identify any evidence peculiarly available to defendant that it did not produce and that would shed light on her claim.
Read Czekalski v. LaHood, No. 08-5431
Appellate Information
Argued October 13, 2009
Decided December 29, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Henderson
Counsel
For Appellant:
Ellen K. Renaud, David H. Shapiro and Richard L. Swick, Swick & Shapiro, P.C., Washington, DC
For Appellee:
Darrell C. Valdez, Assistant United States Attorney, Washington, DC
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
