In plaintiffs’ action against the County of Los Angeles and officials seeking damages for violation of their civil rights under the Civil Code section 52.1 and 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for breach of bailment, and seeking an injunction, arising from an incident when the District Attorney’s Office searched and seized plaintiffs’ property pursuant to a warrant and retained and damaged some of the property, trial court erred in denying defendants’ motion for summary adjudication on all causes of action as defendants are immune to the claims.
Read County of Los Angeles v. Sup. Ct., No. B214842 [HTML]
Read County of Los Angeles v. Sup. Ct., No. B214842 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed January 25, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Aldrich
CounselFor Appellant: Collins Collins Muir & Stewart, Tomas A. Guterres, Douglas Fee, Catherine M. Mathers and Christian E. Foy Nagy
For Appellee: Knickerbocker Law Corporation and Richard L. Knickerbocker
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
