In plaintiff’s suit challenging defendant’s decision to reduce plaintiff-county’s Medi-Cal reimbursements, arising from a contract dispute involving a contract for hospital inpatient services, ruling denying plaintiff’s petition for writ of mandate and upholding the decision by defendant-agency is affirmed where: 1) defendant properly interpreted the Medi-Cal contract; and 2) defendant properly calculated the nurse to patient staffing ratios by using plaintiff’s assignment sheets.
Read County of Kern v. California Dep’t of Health Serv., No. B211594 [HTML]
Read County of Kern v. California Dep’t of Health Serv., No. B211594 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed January 13, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Ashmann-Gerst
CounselFor Appellant: Foley & Lardner, Tami S. Smason, Diane Ung and Jeffrey R. Bates
For Appellee: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Douglas M. Press, Assistant Attorney General, Richard T. Waldow and Gregory M. Cribbs, Deputy Attorneys General
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
