Volkswagen has agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges and settle the federal investigation into its “clean diesel” emissions fraud – for $4.3 billion in civil and criminal penalties. That comes on top of the nearly $15 billion the company has agreed to pay to consumers, making VW’s emissions scandal perhaps the most costly corporate scandal ever.

But that’s hardly the end of things for VW. Last week, six executives were charged with wire fraud, conspiracy, and violations of the Clean Air Act – and more prosecutions could be coming, implicating even the company’s in-house attorneys.

While the investigation into VW’s use of “defeat devices” to evade emissions tests on its diesel vehicles hasn’t resulted in charges against the highest ranking leaders in the company, it has drawn attention to at least one VW attorney. As Corporate Counsel noted, the statement of facts attached to last Wednesday’s plea agreement implicates one, so-far-unidentified VW lawyer, called “Attorney A.”

Attorney A was “the in-house attorney principally responsible for providing legal advice in connection with VW AG’s response to U.S. emissions issues.” As such, the attorney was part of discussions surrounding a litigation hold on documents.

The attorney told VW employees that a litigation hold would soon apply to certain documents, statements which employees “understood to mean that they should delete documents prior to the hold being issued.”

Employees then deleted thousands of documents.

Poor Communication or Obstruction of Justice?

What exactly did Attorney A say to employees that caused them to start rapidly hitting delete? Were VW workers actually instructed to destroy documents, even implicitly? The document doesn’t say.

But that’s just one interpretation.

The best case interpretation of the facts in the plea agreement is that the attorney did not clearly and accurately define the employees’ obligations and the potential ramifications of destroying evidence, and the employees misinterpreted the warnings of a coming litigation hold. The attorney presumably did not explain that deleting documents relevant to a criminal investigation is a separate offense.

So far, those indictments have reached engine developers, quality management supervisors, an engineering manager, and an environmental compliance manager – but no in-house attorneys.

Related Resources:

  • The Yates Memo Is Causing In-House Counsel to Rethink Their Careers (FindLaw’s In House)
  • Lessons From Volkswagen’s Emissions Fraud Disaster (FindLaw’s In House)
  • EPA Accuses Fiat Chrysler of Using Hidden, Polluting Software (FindLaw’s In House)

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Civil Rights

Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court

Criminal

Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records

Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules