Trial court judgment sustaining demurrer filed by defendant without leave to amend and dismissing the action is affirmed where the court properly found it lacked jurisdiction to review the propriety of plaintiff’s regional housing needs assessment allocation as the administrative procedure established under Government Code sect. 65584 to calculate a local government’s allocation of the regional housing needs assessment is intended to be the exclusive remedy for the municipality to challenge that determination, and reflect a clear intent to preclude judicial intervention in the process.
Read City of Irvine v. Southern California Ass’n of Gov’ts, No. G040513 in PDF
Read City of Irvine v. Southern California Ass’n of Gov’ts, No. G040513 in HTML
Appellate InformationAppeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, William M. Monroe, Judge. Requests for judicial notice. Judgment affirmed. Requests granted.FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREEFiled: June 30, 2009
JudgesBefore RYLAARSDAM, ACTING P.J., MOORE, J., IKOLA, J.Opinion by RYLAARSDAM, ACTING P.J.
CounselFor Plaintiff: Rutan & Tucker, Philip D. Kohn and William H. Ihrke.For Defendant: Fulbright & Jaworski, Colin Lennard; Joanna Africa; Miles Chen Law Group and Patricia J. Chen.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
