In plaintiff’s legal malpractice suit, his request for writ of relief from two orders excluding evidence in favor of his former attorneys is granted and the orders vacated as the communications are a client and his attorney, outside the presence of, and not otherwise communicated to, any opposing party or the mediator, and reveal nothing said or done in the mediation discussion.
Read Cassel v. Sup. Ct., No. B215215 [HTML]
Read Cassel v. Sup. Ct., No. B215215 [PDF]
Filed November13, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Jackson
Counsel
For Appellant: Makarem & Associates, Ronald W. Makarem, Peter M. Kunstler and Jamie R. Greene
For Appellee: Haight Brown & Bonesteel, Peter Q. Ezzell, Nancy E. Lucas and Stephen M. Caine
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
