Plaintiff’s appeal from an order summarily adjudicating one of the three causes of action in its petition for writ of administrative mandate involving the assessment of a winery is dismissed where a ruling on a petition for writ of mandate is not appealable if other causes of action remain pending between the parties.
Read Canandaigua Wine Co. v. County of Madera, No. F055858
Appellate Information
Filed September 2, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Levy
Counsel
For Appellant: Winston & Strawn, Charles J. Moll III, Amanda L. Groves, Troy M. Van Dongen and Kathleen F. McConnell
For Respondent: Cota Cole & Associates, Dennis M. Cota and Carolyn J. Frank.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
