Trial court judgment enjoining enforcement of an ordinance requiring purchasers of large grocery stores to employ the prior store’s workforce for 90 days is affirmed where the ordinance requires successor grocery employers to employ experienced workers in order to maintain health and safety standards at the store during the transition to new management and thus enters into a field fully occupied by state law, and is preempted by the California Retail Food Code as well as the National Labor Relations Act.
Read California Grocers Assoc. v. City of LA, No. B206750 in PDF
Read California Grocers Assoc. v. City of LA, No. B206750 in HTML
Appellate InformationAPPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ralph W. Dau, Judge. Affirmed.SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVEFiled July 30, 2009
JudgesBefore: KRIEGLER, J., TURNER, P.J., MOSK, J. Opinion by KRIEGLER, J.Dissenting Opinion by MOSK, J.
CounselFor Plaintiff: Jones Day, Richard S. Ruben, Craig E. Stewart and Nathaniel P. Garrett.
For Defendant: Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Laurie Rittenberg, Assistant City Attorney, and John A. Carvalho, Deputy City Attorney.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
