Trial court’s denial of defendants’ requests for attorney’s fees, brought after they successfully defended against a claim of civil rights violations involving a ballot measure relating to certain political activities of labor organizations, is affirmed where: 1) defendants were not entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to Code of Civil Proc. section 1038 because this action did not qualify as a “civil proceeding under the California Tort Claims Act” for purposes of the statute; and 2) the trial court did not err in denying defendants’ second motion for fees under the federal Civil Rights Attorney’s Fees Awards Act of 1976.
Read California Corr. Peace Officers Ass’n v. Virga, No. A123989 [HTML]
Read California Corr. Peace Officers Ass’n v. Virga, No. A123989 [PDF]
Appellate Information
Filed January 15, 2010
Judges
Opinion by Judge Sepulveda
CounselFor Appellant: Littler Mendelson, John J. Skonberg, Richard H. Rahm, Joshua D. Kienitz; Department of Personnel Administration, State of California, K. William Curtis, Warren C. Stracener, Paul M. Starkey, Jennifer M. Garten, Ronald R. Pearson
For Appellee: Carroll, Burdick & McDonough, Gregg McLean Adam, Laurie J. Hepler; California Correctional Peace Officers’ Association, Daniel M. Lindsay
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
