In plaintiffs’ dispute over the sale of a house purchased from defendant, trial court’s decision to vacate the arbitrator’s award in favor of the plaintiffs is affirmed and plaintiffs’ petition for writ of mandate denied as the arbitrator excluded material evidence that substantially prejudiced defendant pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1286.2
Read Burlage v. Sup. Ct., No. B211431
Filed October 20, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Gilbert
Counsel
For Appellant: Hoefflin & Associates, ALC, Richard M. Hoefflin, Jason M. Burrows; Lascher & Lascher, Wendy Cole Lascher
For Real Party in Interest: Horvitz & Levy, Lisa Perrochet, John A. Taylor, Jr.; Lang, Hanigan & Carvalho, LLP, John D. Lang; Smith Law Firm, Craig R. Smith
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Civil Rights
Block on Trump’s Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Criminal
Judges Can Release Secret Grand Jury Records
Politicians Can’t Block Voters on Facebook, Court Rules
